Making the Black Box Speak.
Towards a renegade aesthetics of resolution
Visibility and knowledge are based on access to information. We usually consider this as either a question of collecting new or examining existing data. However, the term ‘black box society’ (Frank Pasquale) points to a situation in which data are deliberately concealed: manufacturing information asymmetry – imbalances of power mainly due to misinformation, concealment or fraud – has become an effective tool for gaining competitive advantage across all levels of life. In other words, technocapitalism unleashes a deepening crisis of the body politic.
Making the Black Box Speak
addresses these issues by focusing on resolution. The term’s semiotic wealth – ranging from what we can see to what we can know to how we make decisions – evokes an ecology in which all bodies can communicate; but it also reveals how automated control predicts, curtails and exploits common potentials.
Producing resolution against the black box is, however, barely accessible to direct action or critique. Therefore, we apply a different strategy: we form alliances with those that make the black box speak from inside. Episode 3 revolves around the precarious and ambivalent figure of the renegade – such as a whistleblower or dissident. While the system treats her as a traitor, she is an educator for the public at large: her disclosures constitute crucial intelligence against the social noise of black box asymmetry.
Making the Black Box Speak
probes forms of resistance (epistemic, social and affective) and solidarity (how to share risks together) that cut through the black box. What is at stake here is deeply performative, material and bodied. The question Episode 3 explores is how we can leverage the rich body of resolution to resolve what is disrupted and marginalized.
Making the Black Box Speak
is a call to move from established critical frameworks of art and other fields of research to the insurrection of renegade activism.